IFPI introduces new rules for generative AI music in official charts

Announced on 30 July, the framework is intended to distinguish between music driven by human creativity and recordings that are entirely synthetic or generated using unauthorised AI systems. It also seeks to prevent recordings with artificially inflated streaming figures from gaining recognition in official rankings.

Under the new principles, an AI-assisted recording will be eligible for chart inclusion if the AI service used to create the recording is lawful and properly authorised, the recording is substantially created by humans and the recording is not associated with stream or chart manipulation.

IFPI said the principles were developed in consultation with its global member companies and are intended to provide a common framework for official chart compilers, music industry organisations and other stakeholders.

The organisation said the guidelines would allow for the appropriate use of AI in the creative process while maintaining the role of official charts as a measure of human artistic achievement.

The framework follows similar guidelines announced by a coalition of major music companies, including Sony Music, Universal Music Group and Warner Music Group, earlier in July.

IFPI will initially apply the principles to official charts it directly manages across Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and Southeast Asia. It will also work with its national group network to support the adoption of the framework by more than 20 additional official chart organisations worldwide.

“Official music charts do more than just track sales; they celebrate human artistry and endeavour,” IFPI chief executive Victoria Oakley said. “As fans, we want to recognise the achievements of the artists creating the music we love, and it's right that charts continue to showcase music with human creativity at its heart.”

The move comes amid growing concerns about the rapid increase of AI-generated music on streaming services. Music industry organisations have raised concerns that some generative AI systems may have been trained using copyrighted recordings without authorisation, while rights holders continue to call for licensing frameworks that protect creators.

“When properly licensed and authorised, AI provides exciting opportunities to enhance the creative toolkit,” Oakley said. “These principles provide a pathway for that innovation, while ensuring we don't include tracks generated by systems that are ripping off artists and their music.”

“AI is evolving rapidly, and it's critical that the music community takes the lead on how to ensure technology and human artistry grow together responsibly,” she added.